Open Letter to The President
of The Canadian
By Michael Pyshnov
CBC has been refusing, for several
years, to report the story of science fraud and the unprecedented persecution
of a scientist by the University of Toronto. This story, however, is not
going to go away. I am, being the victim of this persecution, reporting
it now to the public.
I was doing Ph.D. research in genetics
at the U of T for five years. I was then removed from the University and
my research and discoveries were stolen and published by others. I was
blacklisted and was unable to find a job for the next 14 years. The fraud
is seen clearly in the documents, some posted on the Graduate Students'
Union web site (www.toronto.edu/gsunion/pyshnov.html)
and remain there for two years together with the GSU appeal to the faculty.
I do not know for how long they will remain posted.
The main perpetrator of the fraud
is female, Jewish, and a peace-and-abortion activist with a full set of
leftist agenda. Despite my repeated complaints of fraud, the U of T did
not wish to return the discoveries under my name and did not wish to condemn
her. Instead, the political interests that stand behind her condemned me
to remain virtually under house arrest with the work of my life stolen
and my name stolen. Ellen Larsen, the prostitute of science, went to Harvard,
Berkeley and other places boasting of the stolen research.
The University did everything for
this "role model" to remain the author of my discoveries. Things
of this sort happened as a rule under communist regimes, but I do not know
of any example when a university
would do such barbarous machination in
science. The answers to my complaints
were written as insulting, contemptuous provocation. To save Larsen and
her false academic credentials, professors at high levels were found (Ian
Orchard, Donald Dewees) who wrote reports full of conniving and deceit,
falsifying the law and each and every rule that has existed in universities
They said, yes, your ideas were
"picked up", Larsen "repeated" and "replicated
or extended" your experiments, but you have received "academic
and financial support" and she "salvaged"
your research. They called my research "not confidential" (?)
and called my arguments for the restoration of my authorship a "naive
meanderings"; they said that I "lost the right to complain".
Dewees never mentioned that I did a Ph.D. research, he called it a "joint
research" (with Larsen).
Another 77 professors of the Department
were prevented from looking into my case, as each of them was sent a letter
from a lawyer. Only one of them wrote a letter on my behalf. The Ministry
of Education was "in conflict of interest". Every organization
in academia is "in conflict". The police and The Attorney General
of Ontario suppressed the evidence. Attorney General of Canada did not
respond at all. The lawyers would not touch my civil case, some say: not
Forty-nine law firms are "in conflict". I have no means of bringing
this case to the trial.
Why would the U of T continue the
fraud in such a blatant manner, with the documents showing outright corruption?
Because, they know they have total control over the press as well; no one
is allowed to look into the documents. This route to the restoration of
justice is also closed to me.
U of T says now that I did almost
nothing in five years. If so, why would anybody desire to "salvage"
my research? Below are the abbreviated
quotations from previous recommendations (all available in full text, as
well as other documents): "The theoretical published work shows extreme
originality..", "..he has been invited to international conferences
to discuss this work..", "..outlined an entirely novel approach..",
"This combination of technical and theoretical skill is rare.",
"..a tireless worker..", "..capacity to read and think and
synthesize information for weeks at a time.", "His selection
of problems and approach to them show a clarity of thinking and an appreciation
for elegant work which make his contributions original.", "..inquisitive
mind..", ".. great technical skill and perseverance..",
"..his contributions.. will continue to be above ordinary.",
"His devotion to ideas and the sacrifices he has made.. make it clear
that he is a scholar by nature..", "We estimate he is of first-class
calibre.. our Departmental Graduate Committee ranked him 1st of 7 applicants
for [the highest scholarship in Canada] awards. He has already proven
himself as an independent researcher..", "Mr. Pyshnov's demonstrated
creativity in conceiving of this novel approach plus his superb technical
skills uniquely qualify him to carry out these studies of far reaching
significance.", "..a man of proven scholarly attainments..",
"..a very creative scientist.." (There are many more statements
related to the particular scientific results and the discoveries made by
me in these five years.)
Where are these "studies of
far reaching significance" now? They are published under the authorship
of thieves. Yet, by the time I was at the fifth year of my research, I
became a specialist in the area, the one with the new ideas and the discoveries
totally unexpected by others, but predicted by me from the theory. (I have
developed and published a theory of cell division in the organism and my
dissertation was proving it.)
Having such research going on in
her laboratory was too much of a temptation for Larsen and she began publishing
it when I was still there. Finally, she fraudulently used her power to
declare that my thesis "may not be completed by the time his financial
support terminates" (I had one more year before asking for an extension).
She got rid of me and secretly wrote three more papers stealing my research
and then published two of them. A year after I left, she proposed me to
publish the third one (I did not know about the other two and she did not
mention them) together with her.
I called her a thief and complained. In
a letter to me, the Department stated, without objections, that Larsen
withdrew the paper. But..
she slightly changed it and published it herself as well.
I later learned from the documents that, although, I was removed for the
supposed lack of funding, Larsen had hired an undergraduate student to
repeat my experiments and to claim her
Larsen continues to boast of her
new possession -- the stolen intellect. But, this possession is not even
in her main line of business, which is -- the real estate and multiple
other enterprises (she says she pays taxes exceeding her professorial salary).
Her pet political agenda was "to take economic crimes out of the criminal
code". In her science fraud, she went as far as claiming a scientific
publication that does not exist and claiming "hundreds
of experiments" done by me during
the five years as her own work. (The dates show, however, that she had
only 51 days for it!) There were many more documented instances of fraud
and falsification. When confronted with documents showing the fraud, Larsen
declared "the concept of intellectual property": my discoveries
and ideas do not belong to me, they belong to a "community" which,
she implied, is better represented by her. (Yet, she could hardly comprehend
my earlier articles, for which I received requests from more than 200 scientists
from around the world.) She added that I "forfeited a publication
for naught". Normally, she would have been called a sadistic adventuress
and not allowed anywhere near a university. But, the Ottawa's Office of
Research Integrity said: "Dr. Larsen behaved in a reasonable manner
given your refusal to have the 1987 article published"! They offered
no other comment or explanation. Can authorship
Was she valuable as a scientist
to the U of T? She cannot claim any discoveries, except the ones stolen
and accompanied in her papers with a lot of near-scientific jargon. The
following incident shows her as a teacher:
On the examination with some 200
undergraduates I pointed out to her that students cannot give an answer
by looking at the poor drawing that she supplied. She replied: "No,
they can not. But a good student should remember the page in the handbook
with this drawing and what was on it." Her involvement with science
is motivated by the ease with which things can be falsified there.
A couple of years ago, CBC showed
a movie recreating the events at Concordia University where Prof. V. Fabrikant
shot and killed four of his colleagues for stealing his research. CBC said
nothing about the crimes of scientific establishment, but the investigations
had shown that "academic fraud" perpetrated by professors is
"wide spread" in Canadian Universities.
Does the University of Toronto
(for years now) look forward to the similar events with the hope of getting
rid of me and probably killing me in jail to make sure that there will
never be a trial and the truth about their crimes will never come out?
I think, it is their plan: for schemers and bloodsuckers, provocation had
always been a method to get rid of the victim. The stand-off is continuing:
I am not doing anything wrong and they have nothing to blame me for, in
the past or in the present. They just continue the fraud for which they
have no defense, no justification and nothing to say publicly. To those
who ask questions, they make reference to the Fabricant's case and demand
silence. And they carefully watch that there is no word in the press of
what is going on.
I do not deserve any of this.
The media, the CBC, which has a duty towards the public, must report the
events and make the documents public. I am trying to make people think;
are you trying to do the opposite? Why, Mr. Rabinovitch, has "The
Fifth Estate" refused, for years,
to air my story? I sent the documents to Suzanna Mayer, she refused. I
came and spoke with Francine Pelltier, she had to call me back, but she
did not. Theresa Burke called me (on the tip from Rick Salutin) and asked
me to call her, repeatedly over several months. Then, she said the story
could not be approved. Howard Goldenthal called me and invited me to talk
(after he discovered the horror story on the U of T web site). At the end
of the meeting I told him that his colleagues received instructions not
to call me back and not to return my documents and tape recording. He said
that Theresa is his friend and, although, others abandoned me, he will
not. He never called and he did not return documents and the tape recording.
I want to make public a tape recording
of a conversation with The President of The Canadian Genetics Society,
Prof. Arthur Hilliker, where he says that he and Prof. S. Blecher "of
course" believe that Larsen plagiarized my work. But, then, he says
that I should keep quiet because.. Jews were persecuted in the Second World
War. But do we need any more proof that the Jewish political interest is
at work here, when we see the media spellbound? He says that "life"
was very unjust to me, but he predicts my complete frustration. Why? Why
should Larsen's fraud be concealed? Another Karla, but with triple protection?
Why would CBC not tell the story of "a very creative scientist"?
Why would CBC not tell the public about the continuing provocation by the
U of T animals skilled in calculating psychological damage to the victim?
I was truly a delicate person and
had so little impulse for violence that I had no desire even to drive a
car. Larsen says that I "left amicably". Not true; I was disliked
by her for smoking and for not smoking marihuana. But, I never commented
on the "issues". The next 14 years of my life were stolen by
the scum of society. It was the time of torture for me, rather -- an uninterrupted
panic attack. In total desperation I spoke personally to some Members of
Parliament and to Mike Harris. They were all "in conflict", in
fact, bound by fear of accusing this "All-In-One" role model
of fraud. The corrupt political forces made me an outlaw for whom the law
is not even supposed to work. Italian Mafia did not have such influence
and did not own the press.
But you, Mr. Rabinovitch, should
take an example of Mexico and South Africa where the media fearlessly reports
corruption and crime on the top. My story is well known to hundreds of
people, but, presently, mostly to those who are "in conflict of interest".
I am now reaching the others, with God's help and provided that the University
of Toronto is not hiring an assassin. Have you forgotten the first law
of the media saying that it should remain above suspicion, no matter what
happens, and the second law saying that things already known to the public
can not be avoided? This country needs to learn how to prosecute "role
Larsen, Orchard and Dewees must
go to jail. The administration of the U of T must cease to exist in its
present membership and so must the Ottawa's Office of Research Integrity.
There must be a public
inquiry forcing The Attorney General and
others to testify (in the case which is more important than a pepper spray
incident). And, here, the role played by the media is well known: all (known)
cases of official corruption and injustice were virtually brought into
the courts by media!
But, the media is monopolized in
the hands of the three or four families whose goals and accomplishments
go far, far beyond making money.
They introduced here communist rules of
political correctness borrowed directly
from the Soviets. Seven days a week we hear the victim-sagas about idealistic
communists, Jewish victims of the extreme right, "progressive females",
etc. The propaganda is having a ruinous effect upon society. It became
impossible to convict Karlas in the court of law. Upon one politically
incorrect utterance, be it made by the media employee or the judge, they
And the media's list of the exploited
and persecuted victims is not even truthful. These
"victims" had and continue to have their own victims.
There were 100 million victims of communism in the past century. And..
the 70% of the Russian revolutionary government were the "idealistic"
Jewish communists. Now, Jewish Communism is sadistically destroying traditions,
lives, culture and morals, while proclaiming professional knowledge, education,
technological necessity, altruism. It operates by faking the purpose.
Disregarding all lessons of history,
the media sticks to its stereotypes and makes an obscene mockery of journalistic
integrity. My story, full of unwanted facts, is turned down again and again,
lately, disposing even with the pretext. Truth-seeking investigative journalists
can only look at me from the television screen; they don't look at me this
way in their offices; no, they don't.
The University of Toronto can not
be called a university anymore. It invented a new fraud -- "salvaging"
of research, providing for transferring
of authorship from the doer to someone
else. It has killed science when the scientist stood in the way of a sick
science-falsifier. It is still continuing now the most vicious fraud and
the most outrageous cover up in Canadian history, the intellectual slave
It perverted, falsified and destroyed
everything that makes a University.
It became the
source of crime, corrupting the academia,
democratic institutions and law enforcement. Justice
at all levels is washing its hands for fear of Jewish, etc., anger and
the immediate removal from duty. This
university has firmly closed all doors to any inquiry. It is fighting for
the survival of the network of crooks inside, and now, also, for the fate
of the government officials that were corrupted by them over the years.
I lived four blocks away from the
place where my research was being "salvaged". This was done by
the individuals most portrayed by the media as the ones who should be trusted!
Referring to this trust, they had, recently, cleaned the public pockets
of 100 million dollars. This fraudulent
university does not need any more money, it needs a criminal trial and
a public inquiry. And, it needs the press.
(July 19, 2000)
Note: This letter was written two years before a number of Canadian journalists
rebelled against monopolization of media in the hands of a few owners and
against Messrs. Aspers restricting the freedom of journalists and firing
them. (Initially, writing articles about Israel was the issue.)
BACK TO THE MAIN PAGE